In rare bipartisan, bicameral meeting with White House officials which extended late into evening, participants worked to craft emergency supplemental appropriations bill providing $40 billion to aid recovery and relief efforts related to Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Senate passed resolution, 98-0, on Sept. 14. House vote was running 198-0 in favor, but vote was delayed short of 218 votes needed for passage when electronic voting system malfunctioned.
House and Senate leaders also expect to take up resolution expressing support for military action President Bush might order in response to attacks. President has proposed joint resolution that would authorize him "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons (who) planned, authorized, harbored, committed or aided in the planning or the commission of the attacks against the US . . . and to deter and pre-empt any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the US."
Schedule for New Farm Legislation Uncertain
Terrorist acts perpetrated against US have necessitated redirection of Congressional attention for foreseeable future, with scheduled House debate on H.R. 2646, Farm Security Act of ’01, among issues that are on hold. Congress also must determine how best to craft and approve 13 appropriations measures necessary to fund agencies and programs beyond Sept. 30, end of FY01 (see related article).
In days leading up to scheduled House consideration of farm bill Sept. 13-14, intense and effective campaign led by Agriculture Committee Chairman Combest (R-TX) and committee members was gaining momentum and generating support for improved farm policy embodied in H.R. 2646. Chairman Combest was in constant contact with Administration and House leaders in effort to maintain focus on importance of new improved policy to respond to severe economic crisis in US agriculture. However, there also has been determined effort led by Environmental Working Group (EWG) and others to undermine support for commodity programs by spotlighting benefits made available to farmers in carefully selected Congressional districts. EWG and allies hope to build support for shifting funds from commodity programs to conservation programs.
While consideration of new legislation is delayed, members of agriculture community are making preparations to work against efforts to undermine support for exceptional new programs authorized by H.R. 2646 and for its passage and enactment at appropriate time.
Options to Meet Deadline for Funding Bills Considered
Congressional leaders are considering various methods to meet Sept. 30 deadline for approving FY02 funding bills. Among options some members are reviewing is Continuing Resolution that would provide funding for programs and agencies so operations can continue into FY02, which begins Oct. 1.
Other members noted, however, that Congress has renewed interest in passing all 13 spending bills and that passing Continuing Resolution would be mistake. They say that Congress should address spending bills individually, whereas Continuing Resolution would allow terrorists to "dictate how the US government is going to run."
As of Sept. 14, Congress had not completed work on any of 13 bills that are in various stages of completion. For example, House has approved FY02 agriculture appropriations measure, and Senate Appropriations Committee has approved different version that has not received consideration by full Senate. With Congress scheduled to be on abbreviated schedule weeks of Sept. 17 and 24 in observance of Jewish holidays, there is probably insufficient time to complete work on 13 bills even with intensive effort.
Crop Estimated at 19.99 Million Bales
In its September report, USDA estimated ’01-02 US cotton production at 19.99 million bales, down just 11,000 bales from August forecast.
Upland production is estimated at 19.38 million bales, down from 19.41 million in August, while ELS production is estimated at 615,000 bales, up 22,000 from previous month. National average yield is estimated at 679 pounds per harvested acre, increase of 9 pounds from August. Upland yield was increased 8 pounds to 669, while ELS yield was increased 19 pounds to 1,235.
In Southeast, upland crop estimate is 5.09 million bales (excluding Florida, which is now placed in "Other States" category by USDA). This represents decrease of 5,000 bales from August report. Decrease of 32 pound per harvested acre in expected yield for South Carolina accounts for lower crop estimate.
Mid-South crop estimate was reduced 150,000 bales to 6.79 million as region’s harvested area was reduced 165,000 acres. Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi saw reduction in harvested area of 70,000 acres, 45,000 acres and 50,000 acres, respectively. Only Louisiana saw reduction in expected yields, down 8 pounds from last month’s estimate.
Upland crop estimate in Southwest (exclusive of Kansas) was increased 10,000 bales to 4.61 million. Oklahoma’s production estimate was raised slightly to 210,000 bales, while Texas remained steady at 4.4 million.
In West, expected upland crop was increased by 105,000 bales to 2.70 million, as expected yield in New Mexico was raised 35 pounds. In California, harvested area was raised 40,000 acres from last month’s estimate and expected yield was lowered to 1,356 pounds per harvested acre.
ELS harvested area in California was increased 5,000 acres to 209,000. This, along with 15-pound increase in expected yield, accounts for 20,000-bale increase in production. Expected ELS yield in Texas was raised 57 pounds, increasing state’s ELS crop estimate by 2,000 bales. ELS harvested area and yield estimates for Arizona and New Mexico were unchanged from previous month.
US Cotton Crop, ’01-02
YIELD PER |
5-YEAR |
480- | ||
HARV. |
HARV. |
AVG. |
POUND | |
ACRES |
ACRE |
YIELD |
BALES | |
Thou. |
Lb. |
Lb. |
Thou. | |
UPLAND |
||||
SOUTHEAST |
3,470 |
704 |
624 |
5,086 |
AL |
605 |
742 |
582 |
935 |
GA |
1,490 |
680 |
629 |
2,110 |
NC |
975 |
729 |
645 |
1,480 |
SC |
296 |
649 |
617 |
400 |
VA |
104 |
743 |
707 |
161 |
MID-SOUTH |
4,565 |
714 |
701 |
6,790 |
AR |
1,080 |
720 |
744 |
1,620 |
LA |
855 |
685 |
674 |
1,220 |
MS |
1,630 |
757 |
753 |
2,570 |
MO |
395 |
681 |
637 |
560 |
TN |
605 |
651 |
592 |
820 |
SOUTHWEST |
4,700 |
471 |
478 |
4,610 |
OK |
200 |
504 |
443 |
210 |
TX |
4,500 |
469 |
479 |
4,400 |
WEST |
1,003 |
1,290 |
1,171 |
2,695 |
AZ |
278 |
1,260 |
1,253 |
730 |
CA |
655 |
1,356 |
1,182 |
1,850 |
NM |
70 |
789 |
685 |
115 |
OTHER STATES* |
161 |
584 |
506 |
196 |
TOTAL UPLAND |
13,899 |
669 |
642 |
19,377 |
ELS |
239 |
1,235 |
1,037 |
615 |
AZ |
6 |
960 |
855 |
12 |
CA |
209 |
1,286 |
1,114 |
560 |
NM |
7 |
686 |
664 |
10 |
TX |
17 |
932 |
787 |
33 |
ALL COTTON |
14,138 |
679 |
649 |
19,992 |
Export Sales Push 6 Million Bales Technology – the Common Thread
Export sales of upland and ELS cotton totaled approximately 5.89 million bales (480 lb.) through Sept. 6, up from 3.42 million for comparable point in ’00-01 marketing year. Major buyers were Turkey (32,235 bales), India (23,835 bales) and Mexico (21,735 bales).
Shipments through Sept. 6 were slightly over 1 million bales, leaving outstanding commitments of 4.88 million.
EPA Upholds Bollgard Re-Registration Deadline
EPA has delayed decision on re-registration of Bt corn varieties for at least 30-45 days to allow anti-biotech groups to view recent Monarch butterfly data. Agency, however, has stated that it will complete re-registration decision for Bollgard by Sept. 30 deadline.
EPA has concerns with current refuge requirements, particularly 5% unsprayed external option. Through anecdotal evidence, agency believes these refuges are being planted on marginal lands, are not being agronomically managed or are being sprayed in violation of requirements. One EPA official has expressed desire to eliminate this option altogether.
NCC staff met with EPA officials to offer rebuttal to EPA’s apparent course. Based on deficiencies of current models used to predict insect resistance, on lack of evidence of any field resistance development and on need for this option in high pressure areas, NCC presented case for maintaining current refuge options. EPA’s agreement with this course of action probably will be contingent upon strengthening of program such as increased compliance monitoring and enforcement, enhanced resistance monitoring and local or regional development of remedial action plans.
Monsanto is scheduled to begin final re-registration negotiations with EPA Sept. 17.
Beltwide Production Conferences
Jan. 8-12, 2002, Atlanta
Marriott Marquis and Hyatt Regency
Pre-registration, hotel reservations (beginning Nov. 1)
and travel arrangements are available at www.cotton.org/beltwide/
Procedures for Loan Forfeiture Established
If producer elects to forfeit cotton price support loan to Commodity Credit Corp., producer need not take any action. Upon maturity, CCC will deem loan forfeited and will take title to cotton. Producer will owe the following charges for any forfeited cotton: 1) all warehouse storage charges associated with cotton that accrued before cotton was pledged as collateral for CCC loan; and 2) any accrued warehouse receiving charges associated with forfeited cotton (charges for new ties, etc.). Interest charges are waived. Producers should be aware that charges also accrue to them if option to purchase contracts are not exercised by merchants. FSA offices are required to send letters to owners of bale if forfeiture is about to occur.
NCC Submits T-Yield Recommendations to USDA
In letter submitted to Hunt Shipman, Deputy Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services, NCC expressed concern that Risk Management Agency (RMA) proposal to update cotton crop insurance T-yields would create significant hardship for some cotton growers and imperil their ability to obtain financing for ’02 crop.
Letter noted that statutory language provides RMA with significant flexibility as regards both definition and purpose of T-yields. Specific recommendations were: 1) retain current 10% cup on maximum reduction in individual actual production history (APH) calculation when substituted yields are used; 2) if T-yield for given county is reduced, apply new T-yield only prospectively in calculation of APH – current T-yield values would be retained in APH calculations; 3) apply cup of 10% to maximum reduction in any T-yield relative to level in ’01; 4) investigate use of long-term trend yields based on regression analysis to establish future T-yields; and 5) examine impact on APHs (including T-yields), rates and loss ratios from utilizing yield per harvested acre basis instead of current yield per planted acre.
Trade in Cotton Futures to Resume
New York Board of Trade (NYBOT), previously located at World Trade Center, announced temporary facility and trading hours. Trade of cotton futures is expected to resume Sept. 17 in facility on Long Island, NY, with cotton trading scheduled for 3:30 to 5p.m. (ET). Time change and shortened hours are required by limited facility and accommodation of trading hours for sugar, coffee, cocoa and orange juice. NYBOT pushed back first notice day for October ’01 No. 2 cotton contract from Sept. 24 to Sept 26.
Effective Sept. 14-20, ’01
Adjusted World Price, SLM 1 1/16 27.55 cents*
Coarse Count Adjustment 0.00 cents
Current Step 2 Certificate Value 3.78 cents
Marketing Loan Gain Value 24.37 cents
*No Adjustment Made Under Step I
Five-Day Average
Current 3135 c.i.f. N.Europe 41.62 cents
Forward 3135 c.i.f. N.Europe No Quote
Coarse Count c.i.f. N.Europe 39.70 cents
Current US c.i.f. N.Europe 46.65 cents
Forward US c.i.f. N.Europe No Quote