NCC-Prepared Summary of Respective Farm Bills' Key Provisions

The NCC prepared a summary of the key provisions of the full Senate's and the House Agriculture Committee's versions of the 2012 Farm Bill.

Published: July 31, 2012
Updated: July 31, 2012

June 21: Senate approved the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act by a vote of 64 – 35.

July 11: House Agriculture Committee approved the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act by a vote of 35 – 11.

Cotton Provisions

Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX) for Upland Cotton

  • Revenue insurance product authorized in Title XI – Crop Insurance
  • Provisions common to both Senate and House bills include

o  Producer makes annual decision to purchase STAX

o  Projected price based on futures market during pre-planting period

  • Senate uses futures market only
  • House uses higher of futures market or fixed reference price of $0.6861

o  Expected county yield is higher of long-term trend yield or 5-year Olympic average yield

o  Expected county income determined as product of projected price and expected county yield

o   Actual county income determined as product of harvest-time futures market and actual county yield

o   Indemnity triggered if actual county income falls below selected coverage level multiplied by expected county income

o   Ability to purchase coverage over span of 90% to 70%, effectively covering 20% span

  • Coverage adjustable in 5% increments

o  Premium subsidy set at 80%

o  Available in all counties with cotton production

o  Ability to customize policy by selecting protection factor over range of 0.8-1.2

  • Does not alter frequency of indemnity but adjusts level of indemnity by ±20%

o  Ability to add harvest price protection

  • Allows coverage to adjust upward if futures market rises by harvest

o  Can purchase on 100% of upland cotton area

o  Buy-up coverage not required in order to purchase STAX

o  Products differentiated by irrigated and non-irrigated practices where data available

  • STAX differences include

o  Senate uses futures market to determine projected price; House establishes projected price based on higher of futures market or reference price of $0.6861

o   Senate specifies STAX in '13 if practicable; House mandates STAX in '13

Marketing Loan for Upland Cotton

  • Provisions common to both Senate and House bills include

o  Loan rate set equal to the 2-year moving average of the Adjusted World Price (AWP) for the two most recently completed marketing years

o  Announced Oct. 1 preceding plantings

o  Determination of prevailing world market price and premiums/discounts unchanged from '08 bill

o  Rules for import quotas unchanged from '08 bill

  • Differences in storage credits

o  Senate bill provides at '06 crop rates reducedby 20%

o  House bill provides at '06 crop rates reduced by 10%

Economic Adjustment Assistance Program

  • Maintained at $0.03 per pound

Extra Long Staple Cotton Provisions

  • Loan rate maintained at $0.7977 per pound
  • Competitiveness provisions unchanged from '08 bill

General Insurance Provisions

Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO)

  • New insurance product available for purchase that will insure a portion of the value of the deductible in an underlying insurance product that will generally be available for all program crops with sufficient county-level data
  • Provisions common to both Senate and House bills include

o  For acres not enrolled in a Title I revenue program (i.e. Senate's Agricultural Risk Coverage and House's Revenue Loss Coverage), SCO indemnities are triggered when the county experiences a 10% loss

o  Loss triggers can be based on county revenue or county yield; triggers willdepend on underlying insurance policy

o  Upland cotton producers may purchase either STAX or SCO, but may not purchase both products on the same acre

o  Premium subsidy of 70%

o  Begin to provide coverage not later than the '13 crop

  • SCO differences include

o  In the Senate bill, acres enrolled in the Title I revenue program ARC face a 21% loss trigger in SCO

o  In the House bill, acres enrolled in the Title I revenue program RLC are ineligible to purchase SCO

Other Insurance Provisions

  • Provisions common to both Senate and House bills include

o  Enterprise unit pricing made permanent, i.e. 80% subsidy on coverage up to 70%

o  Beginning with '13 crop, make available separate enterprise units for irrigated and non-irrigated acreages

o  To determine county yields, expand data sources to include RMA, NASS or other data as determined by Secretary

o  Increases the T-yield from 60% to 70% of county average

o  Future SRA changes are budget neutral

  • Differences include

o  Beginning with '14 crop, House bill authorizes purchase of different coverage levels on irrigated and non-irrigated acres

o  Senate bill imposes AGI means test on premium subsidies – If AGI > $750k, then premium subsidy reduced by 15 percentage points

o  Senate bill requires conservation compliance on insured acres


Selected Title I Provisions

Repeal of DCP & ACRE Programs

  • Senate and House bills repeal Direct Payments, Counter-cyclical Payments and ACRE Program for all commodities

Price/Revenue Provisions for "Covered" Commodities

  • Senate and House bills take different approaches to the price/revenue provisions available for "covered" commodities, excluding upland cotton
  • Key features of the Senate's Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) include

o  One-time irrevocable election to receive individual coverage or county coverage under ARC

o  Benchmark revenue generally determined as product of 5-yr Olympic average price and the 5-yr Olympic average yield, either county or individual depending on election

  • Special rules for rice and peanuts that allow substitution of fixed prices ($13.00/cwt and $530/ton, respectively) in 5-yr Olympic average price

o  Actual revenue is the actual yield (either county or individual depending on selection) multiplied by the higher of the midseason price and the loan rate

o  Payments made if actual revenue falls below 89% of benchmark revenue, but payment cannot exceed 10% of benchmark, effectively covering 89%-79% span

o   For county program, paid on 80% of planted acres & 45% of prevented planting; for individual program, paid on 65% of planted & 45% of prevented planting; planted acres not to exceed base

  • Key Features of House's Price Loss Coverage (PLC) and Revenue Loss Coverage (RLC)

o   One-time irrevocable election on a crop-by-crop, farm-by-farm basis to participate in either PLC or RLC

o  PLC reference prices for selected commodities: wheat - $5.50; corn - $3.70; sorghum - $3.95; rice - 14.00; soybeans - $8.40; peanuts - $535

o   PLC payment rate is difference between the reference price and the higher of the mid-season average price and the loan rate

o   Under PLC, one-time opportunity in 2013 to update payment yield to 90% of '08-12 Olympic average yield per planted acre; for '08-12 years, producer can use 75% of county yield as plug; CCP yield used
if producer opts not to update

o   Payment acres under PLC equals sum of 85% of planted acres and 30% of acres prevented planting with payment acres not to exceed base

o   Under RLC, benchmark revenue generally determined as the product of the 5-yr Olympic average price and the 5-yr Olympic average county yield

  • In any year of the 5-year period, the reference price may be substituted for the marketing year average price
  • In any year of the 5-year period, 70% of the transitional yield may be substituted for the actual county yield

o   Actual county revenue is the actual county yield multiplied by the higher of the midseason price and the loan rate

o   RLC payments made when actual county revenue falls below 85% of the benchmark revenue, but payment cannot exceed 10% of benchmark, effectively covering 85%-75% span

o   Payment acres under RLC equals sum of 85% of planted acres and 30% of acres prevented planting with payment acres not to exceed base

o   To the extent practicable, RLC programs differentiated by irrigated and non-irrigated practice where data are available

Marketing Assistance Loans

  • Senate and House bills specific marketing loan rates for selected commodities at the following levels: wheat -$2.94; corn - $1.95; sorghum - $1.95; rice - 6.50; soybeans - $5.00; peanuts - $355 (Rates for upland cotton and ELS cotton detailed in previous section)

Payment Limits and Eligibility Tests

  • The Senate and House bills both incorporate changes to limits and means tests associated with Title I program benefits. Note that the restrictions detailed in this section do not apply to STAX or other insurance products
  • Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) means test

o  Senate at $750k means test for ARC, MLG/LDPs

o  House at $950k means test for PLC, RLC, MLG/LDPs

  • Limits on Price/Revenue Programs

o  Senate at $50k/person/entity on ARC payments; separate limit for peanuts

o  House at $125k/person/entity on PLC/RLC payments; separate limit for peanuts

  • Limits on Marketing Loan Gains/Loan Deficiency Payments

o  Senate at $75k/person/entity; separate limit for peanuts

o  House has no limit on MLG/LDPs (consistent with current law)

  • Definition of Actively Engaged

o  Senate requires contribution of management "and" labor

o  House maintains current language requiring management "or" labor


Selected Provisions from Other Titles

  • Conservation Reserve Program

o   Incremental reduction to 25 million acres by FY17

  • Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)

o Maintains payment limitation of $200,000 per person or legal entity

o Allows a one-time contract renewal if the producer agrees to an increase in conserving practices

o Expiring CRP acres receive priority if they want to enroll in CSP

o House allows enrollment of 9,000,000 acres per fiscal year and the Senate allows enrollment of 10,348,000 acres per fiscal year

  • Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)

o Consolidates Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) into the EQIP program

o Keeps the current 60% of funds carve out for livestock and adds a 5% of funds carve out for wildlife habitat

o Funding in the House is $1.75 billion for 2013-2017. Senate funding ranges from $1.5 in 2013 to $1.65 billion starting in 2015

  • Agricultural Conservation Easement Program

o Combines the Wetlands Reserve Program, Grasslands Reserve Program and the Farmland Protection Program in one wetland and agricultural easement program

o Maintains appraisal valuation

o Funding in both bills is no less than 40% for FY 2013-2016 and in the House no less than 50% for FY 2017 for agricultural land easements and the balance to wetlands.

o Allows priority for lands coming out of CRP to enter the easement program

Trade Programs

  • Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) Programs funded annually at current levels of $200 million and $34.5 million, respectively