Note: You are reading this message either because you can not see our css files, or because you do not have a standards-compliant browser.

LOGO: Journal of Cotton Science

 

Evaluation of Postemergence Weed Control Programs in Cotton Without the Addition of Glyphosate

Authors: Savana Denton, Tyson Raper, Christopher Main, Darrin Dodds, Angela McClure, and Tom Mueller
Pages: 125-135
Weed Science
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/DTZJ4969)

Glyphosate has played an important role in agricultural production systems, especially after the release of glyphosate resistant crops.  With increased usage and an overall reliance on chemical control, weed resistance to glyphosate has occurred and is now a major issue.  The objective of this research was to investigate weed control levels provided by glufosinate, 2,4-D, and clethodim as an alternative to glyphosate.  Multiple POST applications generally provided superior weed control in comparison to a single early-POST application.  No programs provided greater than 80% warm-season grass control beginning 21 d after mid-POST application.  Applications of glufosinate or glufosinate + 2,4-D fb clethodim + glufosinate, glufosinate + 2,4-D, or clethodim + glufosinate + 2,4-D provided adequate broadleaf weed control throughout the rating period.  Although POST-only programs are an option, they are not a sustainable weed control practice.  It remains important to incorporate residual herbicides into a weed control program as well as alternative weed control methods.