About
  PDF
Full Text
(52 K)

The Effect of CGA-362622 on Graminicide Efficacy

Daniel B. Reynolds, Shani L. File, Jason C. Sanders and Erin L. Sanders


 
ABSTRACT

Experiments were conducted at the Plant Science Research Center, Starkville, MS, to evaluate johnsongrass control with tank mixtures and sequential applications of 2.15 g ai/A CGA-362622 with 0.069 lbs ai/A Assure (quizalofop-P), 0.188 lbs ai/A Fusilade (fluazifop-P), and 0.125 lbs ai/A Select (clethodim). Treatments were arranged as a two factor factorial in a randomized complete block design. Factor A consisted of application timings of CGA-362622 7, 3, and 1 day before and after application of each graminicide. At day 0 (when the graminicide was applied) CGA-362622 was also tankmixed with each graminicide. Additionally, each graminicide was applied alone for comparison with the sequential and tankmixture applications. Factor B consisted of graminicides, all of which were applied at day 0 to minimize differences in control due to johnsongrass size.

Johnsongrass control 28 days after treatment (DAT), with all graminicides, was reduced (14 - 54%) when tankmixed with CGA 362622. Tank mixtures with Select resulted in 54% antagonism 28 DAT, which was greater than with any other graminicide. Johnsongrass control was reduced more when CGA-362622 was applied 1 or 3 days prior to Assure or Fusilade than when applied 1 or 3 days after. Johnsongrass control was generally affected the same by CGA-362622 applied before or after applications of Select. Based upon these preliminary data it would appear that CGA-362622 should not be tankmixed with a graminicide. It also appears that less antagonism occurs when the graminicide is applied first than when applied sequentially with CGA-362622. Overall it would appear that at least a 3 day interval should be allowed following graminicide application before application of CGA-362622. If CGA-362622 is applied first then at least a 7 day interval before application of graminicides is needed to reduce chances of antagonism.





Reprinted from Proceedings of the 2001 Beltwide Cotton Conferences pp. 1211 - 1212
©National Cotton Council, Memphis TN

[Main TOC] | [TOC] | [TOC by Section] | [Search] | [Help]
Previous Page [Previous] [Next] Next Page
 
Document last modified XXXXXX, XXX XX 2001