About |
(33 K) |
|
Evidence has shown that soil fertilization cannot always meet cottons high demand for nitrogen and supplementation with foliar fertilizer has become a widespread practice. However, yield responses to foliar-applied nitrogen have not always been consistent. CoRoN, a slow release nitrogen fertilizer, has been proposed as a potentially superior alternative method of foliar feeding with nitrogen. The value of CoRoN for enhancing growth and yield of cotton was evaluated in a seven-year field study in Arkansas. Foliar application of CoRoN to field-grown cotton resulted in significant (P=0.05) yield increases in 2 out of 7 years, with an overall average increase of 44 kg lint ha -1 compared to the control. Compared to foliar-applied urea, CoRoN increased yields an average of 14 kg lint/ha but this was not statistically significant. Furthermore, CoRoN caused a significant increase in boll weight in 1 out of 5 years with no significant effect on boll number. The effect of CoRoN on petiole nitrate concentrations was inconsistent. Foliar application of CoRoN caused no significant phytotoxicity up to 22.4 kg N ha -1 (20 lb. N acre -1 ), in contrast to foliar-applied urea which caused significant leaf burn at 11.2 kg N ha -1 (10 lb. N acre -1 ). From this work it can be concluded that the effect of foliar-applied CoRoN on yield was not significantly different from urea. CoRoN had an advantage of not causing any significant foliar burn. These studies indicate that as a foliar nitrogen fertilizer CoRoN does not consistently improve cotton yield. |
|
|
©National Cotton Council, Memphis TN |
Document last modified XXXXXX, XXX XX 2001
|