ABSTRACT
Pix ® Plus, a plant growth regulator applied to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a combination of mepiquat chloride (MC) and Bacillus cereus (Bc).
MC is commonly used to control excessive vegetation by reducing shoot
growth. Although MC has been reported to increase lint yield, positive
yield responses have not been consistent. A reduction in vegetative growth
may allow photoassimilates to be reallocated to reproductive plant parts,
increasing the potential to enhance yield. However, reduced shoot growth
results in decreased plant height, which can also potentially reduce total
sympodial node production and the total number of fruiting sites. The
bacterium Bc purportedly enhances plant growth, thus the combination of
MC and Bc allows for the control of excessive vegetative growth while
potentially promoting reproductive growth. The impacts of additional Bc
rates and application timings remain undetermined. Field experiments were
conducted in 1999 and 2000 at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
in Burleson County, Texas to asess the benefits of additional Bc
applications to Pix ® Plus treated cotton. Experimental design was a 6 by 6
latin square with five treatments and a control. All 5 treatments received
8 oz/A Pix ® Plus at MHS and EB (area standard; AS), while three
treatments received an additional 1 oz/A application of Bc at either PHS,
EB, or EB + 3 weeks. The remaining treatment received 1 oz/A Bc at all
three timings (Bcx3). Mid-season data supports typical MC results in
which plant height, nodes, and the average length of the top five internodes
(ALT-5) were reduced in all Pix ® Plus treatments compared to the control.
Fruit counts at EB were significantly higher in the PHS treatment than in
all others. Plant height at harvest was reduced in all Pix ® Plus treatments
compared to the control, while nodes at harvest were unaffected resulting
in a reduced height to node ratio. Box mapping revealed no differences
among boll weights or boll distribution. In 1999, there were no differences
in yield, although additional Bc applications in 2000 showed significant
seedcotton increases over the control and AS. The EB and Bcx3 treatments
had higher significantly higher lint yield than the AS, but did not out-yield
the control in 2000. There were no differences in lint quality among
treatments.
|